A single agent fails by getting the task wrong. A team of agents fails in ways no single agent can: correlated collapse, diffused responsibility, context fragmentation, and consensus that converges on nothing. The four failure modes that only exist once you have more than one agent — and why adding agents can lower reliability.
Prompt caching can cut your input-token bill by 90% on the reused part of a request — or do nothing at all, with no error to tell you which. It’s an exact-prefix match with a short TTL, and small, common mistakes in how agents build requests break it silently. Here’s what actually gets cached, the five ways real agents lose the discount without noticing, and how to check whether yours is.
The default retry pattern — catch the failure, append ’that didn’t work, try again,’ resend the same messages — doesn’t give the model a clean second attempt. It gives the model a context window containing its own wrong answer, which is exactly the thing most likely to make the second attempt rhyme with the first. Why retries poison the window, how to tell a poisoning retry from a safe one, and a scrub step that keeps the constraints without keeping the wrong path.
Every per-step timeout is a number someone typed in without a model behind it — too short and you kill real work in flight, too long and you pay to sit idle waiting on a hang. Both mistakes are failure modes with a price tag. A small cost model finds the number that actually minimizes total cost instead of the one that felt safe.
Streaming a text response is easy: print tokens as they arrive, order doesn’t matter to the reader. Streaming a tool call is not, because the payload is JSON, and partial JSON is not valid JSON. The three ways people handle that mismatch, why two of them break in production, and the pattern that lets you show progress without ever executing on a half-formed argument.
A retry budget is a language-agnostic idea, but the place you enforce it is not. Python’s tenacity decorators, Go’s context-plus-backoff, and JavaScript’s promise chains each make a different mistake easy and a different guarantee hard. Where the shared budget lives, and the per-language trap that leaks it.
The cheap part of a failed agent run is running it again. The expensive part is that you can’t — the failure was non-deterministic, so the run that broke is gone, and you pay to summon it back. A cost model shows why reproduction, not repair, dominates your debugging bill, and why always-on tracing is almost always cheaper than the alternative it replaces.
A demo proves an agent can succeed once. It says almost nothing about how often it will fail under real load, real input distributions, and real adversarial garbage. The failures that cost you in production are predictable before release — but only if you test the things that actually shift between the demo and the deployment. Four pre-release signals that forecast production failure, and the ones that don’t.
A single agent error rarely stays a single error. The bad output goes into the context, the next step reasons on top of it, and the mistake compounds down the trajectory — one wrong step becoming N wrong steps. This is the cascade, why it’s structurally different from a fleet-wide blast radius, and the three interruption points that stop a local mistake from eating the whole run.
Everyone budgets the token bill because the provider hands you an invoice for it. But an agent in production spends across five other axes that never show up on that invoice — wall-clock latency, orchestration, tool-call fees, human review, and idle polling — and for a lot of workloads the tokens are the smallest line. A model that sums all six so you can see which one you’re actually paying.